At least 10,000 killed in 1989 Tiananmen crackdown: British cable
December 27, 2017
At least 10,000 people were killed in the Chinese army’s crackdown on pro-democracy protesters in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in June 1989, according to a newly released British diplomatic cable that recounts the bloodshed in gruesome detail.
The document, made public more than 28 years after the event, describes injured girls being bayoneted, bodies being ground up by armored vehicles and human remains being flushed into the sewers.
“Minimum estimate of civilian dead 10,000,” the then British Ambassador Alan Donald said in the secret telegram to London seen by AFP at Britain’s National Archives.
The estimate, given on June 5, 1989, the day after the crackdown, is almost 10 times higher than that commonly accepted at the time of several hundred to more than a thousand dead.
But experts questioned by AFP said the 10,000 figure seemed credible.
Donald’s account gives horrific details of the violence unleashed on the night of June 3-4, when the army entered Beijing to end seven weeks of protests on Tiananmen Square, the symbolic heart of Communist power.
During their advance, armored personnel carriers “opened fire on the crowd [both civilians and soldiers] before running over them in their APCs,” wrote the ambassador.
He said his source was a person who “was passing on information given him by a close friend who is currently a member of the State Council” — the Chinese cabinet.
Once the soldiers arrived in Tiananmen Square, “students understood they were given one hour to leave square but after five minutes APCs attacked,” Donald wrote.
“Students linked arms but were mown down including soldiers. APCs then ran over bodies time and time again to make ‘pie’ and remains collected by bulldozer. Remains incinerated and then hosed down drains.”
“Four wounded girl students begged for their lives but were bayoneted,” Donald said, adding: “Army ambulances who attempted to give aid were shot up.”
At the end of June 1989, the Chinese government had said suppression of the “counter-revolutionary riots” had killed 200 civilians and several dozen police and military.
Atrocities done by ‘primitives’
Nearly three decades after the crackdown, the communist regime continues to forbid any debate on the subject, mention of which is banned from textbooks and the media, and censored on the internet.
Donald said the atrocities were committed by the 27th Army, who he described as “60 percent illiterate and are called primitives.”
As to the credibility of the toll, former student protest China scholar Jean-Pierre Cabestan also said the figure was credible, pointing out that recently declassified US documents gave a similar assessment.
“That’s two pretty independent sources which say the same thing,” said Cabestan, a professor at Hong Kong Baptist University.
Former student leader Feng Congde, now also based in the United States, pointed out that Donald had sent another telegram three weeks later putting the death toll at between 2,700 and 3,400.
Don’t forget our elders can suffer in silence too: suicide prevention
Many people think that mental health and suicide are not topics that impact our elders but they could not be more wrong. The data tells us there continues to be an emerging trend when it comes to peop...
Wherever you look these days, not matter the developed country, whole population groups and peoples struggle with the daily grind of life. From children in state care to mental health, from affordable housing to the primary health system and from education to employmen...
For the last few years I have been fortunate to have been involved in the aged care sector and have seen both the lows and highs. Today we live in a world where most of us are living longer thank to more awareness around healthy living, the advancement of better medica...
You can’t go past a news paper, radio show or television news story these days without being flooded by all things Bitcoin or Crypto Currency. Some say it’s the new world of money while others suggest its all just a passing fad. Whatever your position or preference of...